Richards v. State

103 So. 3d 912, 2012 WL 5349503, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18979
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richards v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9563
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 2012·No. No. 4D12-71·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively to convictions that were final at the time that decision issued. Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), rev. granted, 81 So.3d 414 (Fla.2012); Davis v. State, 69 So.3d 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Further, at the time of the plea, appellant was clearly advised, and acknowledged that he understood, that his plea could result in his deportation. Flores v. State, 57 So.3d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

[913]*913Appellant s allegation that the drug statute is unconstitutional is without merit. State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012); Maestas v. State, 76 So.3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

GROSS, HAZOURI and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richards v. State, 103 So. 3d 912, 2012 WL 5349503, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18979 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

103 So. 3d 912 (Richards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Davis v. State
69 So. 3d 315 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Flores v. State
57 So. 3d 218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Hernandez v. State
61 So. 3d 1144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Maestas v. State
76 So. 3d 991 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Adkins
96 So. 3d 412 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)