Richards v. State

113 So. 3d 70, 2013 WL 1687881, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6469
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richards v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9563
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 2013·No. No. 5D12-840·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects, except that the judgment and scoresheet shall be corrected to reflect that Count I is a first-degree felony, rather than a life felony. Because the correct score was indicated and used in the computation, it is not necessary that Appellant be re-sentenced or that he be present when the documents are corrected.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

TORPY, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richards v. State, 113 So. 3d 70, 2013 WL 1687881, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6469 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

113 So. 3d 70 (Richards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.