Richard Stokley v. Charles Ryan

704 F.3d 1010, 2012 WL 5928279, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 24412
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richard Stokley v. Charles Ryan. Read the opinion of the Court — 705 F.3d 401
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 27, 2012·No. 09-99004·Published

Opinions

[1011]*1011AMENDED ORDER

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. Pursuant to the rules applicable to capital cases in which an execution date has been scheduled, a deadline was set by which any judge could request a vote on whether the panel’s November 15, 2012 order should be reheard en banc. The panel elected to amend its original order, and the full court was advised of the planned amendment.

A judge requested a vote on whether to hear the panel’s order en banc. A majority of the active, non-recused judges eligible to vote on the en banc call did not vote to rehear the panel order en banc. Therefore, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

No further petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained. En banc proceedings with respect to the original order and the amended order are concluded.

The dissents from the denial of rehearing en banc follow this amended order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Stokley v. Charles Ryan, 704 F.3d 1010, 2012 WL 5928279, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 24412 (9th Cir. 2012).

704 F.3d 1010 (Richard Stokley v. Charles Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nelson v. Quarterman
472 F.3d 287 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
Lockett v. Ohio
438 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Eddings v. Oklahoma
455 U.S. 104 (Supreme Court, 1982)
Hitchcock v. Dugger
481 U.S. 393 (Supreme Court, 1987)
Penry v. Lynaugh
492 U.S. 302 (Supreme Court, 1989)
Atkins v. Virginia
536 U.S. 304 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Smith v. Texas
550 U.S. 297 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Bryson v. Ward
187 F.3d 1193 (Tenth Circuit, 1999)
Williams v. Ryan
623 F.3d 1258 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Stokley v. Ryan
659 F.3d 802 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Maples v. Thomas
132 S. Ct. 912 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Roger McGowen v. Rick Thaler, Director
675 F.3d 482 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
Martinez v. Ryan
132 S. Ct. 1309 (Supreme Court, 2012)
State v. Stokley
898 P.2d 454 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1995)
Styers v. Schriro
547 F.3d 1026 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Lanco, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation
127 S. Ct. 2974 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Cullen v. Pinholster
179 L. Ed. 2d 557 (Supreme Court, 2011)