Richard Stokley v. Charles Ryan
Opinions
[1011]*1011AMENDED ORDER
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. Pursuant to the rules applicable to capital cases in which an execution date has been scheduled, a deadline was set by which any judge could request a vote on whether the panel’s November 15, 2012 order should be reheard en banc. The panel elected to amend its original order, and the full court was advised of the planned amendment.
A judge requested a vote on whether to hear the panel’s order en banc. A majority of the active, non-recused judges eligible to vote on the en banc call did not vote to rehear the panel order en banc. Therefore, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
No further petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained. En banc proceedings with respect to the original order and the amended order are concluded.
The dissents from the denial of rehearing en banc follow this amended order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
704 F.3d 1010 (Richard Stokley v. Charles Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.