Richard Stokley v. Charles Ryan

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richard Stokley v. Charles Ryan. Read the opinion of the Court — 705 F.3d 401
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2012·No. 09-99004·Published

Opinion

FILED FOR PUBLICATION NOV 21 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD DALE STOKLEY, No. 09-99004

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 4:98-CV-00332-FRZ District of Arizona, v. Tucson

CHARLES L. RYAN, ORDER Respondent - Appellee.

Before: McKEOWN, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

The Order issued on November 15, 2012, is withdrawn and an Amended

Order is filed concurrently with this order. With that amendment, Judges

McKeown and Bea vote to deny Stokley's petition for panel rehearing and Judge

Paez votes to grant the petition. No further petitions for panel rehearing will be

entertained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Stokley v. Charles Ryan, (9th Cir. 2012).

Richard Stokley v. Charles Ryan (Richard Stokley v. Charles Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.