Richard Phillips v. Dave Davey
This text of Richard Phillips v. Dave Davey (Richard Phillips v. Dave Davey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 30 2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RICHARD LOUIS ARNOLD PHILLIPS, No. 16-15487
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 1:14-cv-01068-LJO-SAB v.
DAVE DAVEY, Warden, California State MEMORANDUM* Prison at Corcoran,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence J. O’Neill, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 8, 2016** San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and LYNN,*** Chief District Judge.
Petitioner’s request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Barbara M. G. Lynn, United States Chief District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richard Phillips v. Dave Davey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-phillips-v-dave-davey-ca9-2016.