Richard Phillips v. Dave Davey

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richard Phillips v. Dave Davey. Read the opinion of the Court — 659 F. App'x 933
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 30, 2016·No. 16-15487·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 30 2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD LOUIS ARNOLD PHILLIPS, No. 16-15487

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 1:14-cv-01068-LJO-SAB v.

DAVE DAVEY, Warden, California State MEMORANDUM* Prison at Corcoran,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence J. O’Neill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 8, 2016** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and LYNN,*** Chief District Judge.

Petitioner’s request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Barbara M. G. Lynn, United States Chief District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Phillips v. Dave Davey, (9th Cir. 2016).

Richard Phillips v. Dave Davey (Richard Phillips v. Dave Davey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.