Rice v. State

591 So. 2d 212, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5171, 1991 WL 82504
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rice v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 525 So. 2d 509
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 22, 1991·No. No. 89-3007·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of the judgment of conviction and sentence, which includes ordering appellant to pay, as costs, $200 to the State Attorney’s Forfeiture and Investigative Trust Fund.

We affirm the judgment and sentence in all respects except the award of costs, which is reversed, since no notice or opportunity to be heard was afforded appellant. Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rice v. State, 591 So. 2d 212, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5171, 1991 WL 82504 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

591 So. 2d 212 (Rice v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Mays v. State
519 So. 2d 618 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
State v. Beasley
580 So. 2d 139 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)