Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rice v. State

Rice v. State

571 So. 2d 18, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5050
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rice v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 525 So. 2d 509 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 11, 1990·No. Nos. 89-01764, 89-02839·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon sentencing the appellant, the trial court failed to provide written reasons for the upward departure guidelines sentence. In accordance with Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990), the sentence is vacated and the case is remanded to the trial court for sentencing within the guidelines.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PATTERSON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rice v. State, 571 So. 2d 18, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5050 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

571 So. 2d 18 (Rice v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pope v. State
561 So. 2d 554 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)