Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rice v. State

Rice v. State

576 So. 2d 434, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2667, 1991 WL 38150
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 22, 1991
DocketNo. 90-02713
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 576 So. 2d 434 (Rice v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rice v. State, 576 So. 2d 434, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2667, 1991 WL 38150 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgments and sentences and the order concerning restitution but strike the court costs and attorney’s fees without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition after proper notice and opportunity to be heard.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carroll v. State
602 So. 2d 702 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
576 So. 2d 434, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2667, 1991 WL 38150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.