Reynolds v. Strickland
363 F. App'x 394
This text of 363 F. App'x 394 (Reynolds v. Strickland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reynolds v. Strickland, 363 F. App'x 394 (6th Cir. 2010).
Opinion
ORDER
The motion by the appellant, Mark Brown, for a stay of execution is denied, and the panel affirms the district court for the reasons set forth in the district court opinion, Reynolds (Brown) v. Strickland, No. 2:10-cv-27 (S.D.Ohio Feb. 2, 2010), and in our recent opinion in Cooey (Biros) v. Strickland, 589 F.3d 210 (6th Cir.2009).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cooey v. Strickland
589 F.3d 210 (Sixth Circuit, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
363 F. App'x 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-strickland-ca6-2010.