COOEY II v. Strickland
This text of 588 F.3d 1124 (COOEY II v. Strickland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
The court received a petition for rehearing en bane, stay of execution and issuance of a briefing schedule, and the petition was circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active1 judges of the court. Less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition was therefore referred to the original panel.
The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and other relief and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
588 F.3d 1124, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 26744, 2009 WL 4640636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooey-ii-v-strickland-ca6-2009.