Lawrence Reynolds v. Ted Strickland

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 3, 2010·No. 10-3098·Unpublished

Opinion

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 10a0069n.06

No. 10-3098

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

FILED LAWRENCE REYNOLDS, ) Feb 03, 2010 ) LEONARD GREEN, Clerk Plaintiff, ) ) MARK BROWN, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED Intervenor - Appellant, ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR ) THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF v. ) OHIO ) ) TED STRICKLAND, TERRY J. COLLINS, ) ORDER PHILLIP KERNS, and EXECUTION TEAM ) MEMBERS #1-21, ) ) Defendants-Appellees. )

Before: BATCHELDER, Chief Circuit Judge; SILER and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. The motion by the appellant, Mark Brown, for a stay of execution is

denied, and the panel affirms the district court for the reasons set forth in the district court opinion,

Reynolds (Brown) v. Strickland, No. 2:10-cv-27 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 2, 2010), and in our recent opinion

in Cooey (Biros) v. Strickland, 589 F.3d 210 (6th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence Reynolds v. Ted Strickland, (6th Cir. 2010).

Lawrence Reynolds v. Ted Strickland (Lawrence Reynolds v. Ted Strickland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooey v. Strickland
589 F.3d 210 (Sixth Circuit, 2009)