Reynolds v. Reynolds
704 So. 2d 1126, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 413, 1998 WL 17307
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reynolds v. Reynolds. Read the opinion of the Court — 668 So. 2d 245 →
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION GRANTED
We grant appellee’s motion for clarification and based upon appellee’s proper confession of error, the income deduction and civil contempt order entered below is hereby reversed under the authority of this court’s opinion in Nash v. Nash, 688 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reynolds v. Reynolds, 704 So. 2d 1126, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 413, 1998 WL 17307 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
704 So. 2d 1126 (Reynolds v. Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nash v. Nash
688 So. 2d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)