Nash v. Nash

688 So. 2d 428, 1997 WL 80343
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 1997·No. 96-2466·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

688 So.2d 428 (1997)

Frank L. NASH, Appellant,
v.
Patricia C. NASH, Appellee.

No. 96-2466.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 26, 1997.

*429 Stephen K. Loffredo, Miami Shores, for appellant.

Jerry B. Schreiber, Miami, and Frances Schreiber, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's award of temporary attorney's fees finding that such an award was reasonable and not an abuse of discretion. § 61.16, Fla. Stat. (1995); Mueller v. Mueller, 307 So.2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). However, we reverse the entry of the income deduction order solely for the payment of attorney's fees on the basis that such an order is not sanctioned by section 61.1301, Florida Statutes (1995). Humana Health Plans v. Lawton, 675 So.2d 1382, 1384 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)("A statute which is in derogation of common law must be strictly construed, and the presumption is that no change in common law is intended unless the statute explicitly so states.").

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nash v. Nash, 688 So. 2d 428, 1997 WL 80343 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

688 So. 2d 428 (Nash v. Nash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Damaris Torres-Melendez v. Juan Melendez-Andrade
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026
Diaz v. Diaz
66 So. 3d 983 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Rose v. Rose
883 So. 2d 348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Spalding v. Spalding
813 So. 2d 1078 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Silversmith v. Silversmith
797 So. 2d 653 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Colligan v. Colligan
759 So. 2d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Reynolds v. Reynolds
704 So. 2d 1126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)