Reynolds v. Reynolds

704 So. 2d 1126, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 413, 1998 WL 17307
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 21, 1998
DocketNo. 96-3055
StatusPublished

This text of 704 So. 2d 1126 (Reynolds v. Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reynolds v. Reynolds, 704 So. 2d 1126, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 413, 1998 WL 17307 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION GRANTED

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellee’s motion for clarification and based upon appellee’s proper confession of error, the income deduction and civil contempt order entered below is hereby reversed under the authority of this court’s opinion in Nash v. Nash, 688 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nash v. Nash
688 So. 2d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
704 So. 2d 1126, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 413, 1998 WL 17307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-reynolds-fladistctapp-1998.