Reyes v. Superintendent LaManna

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 23, 2024·No. 1:18-cv-08724·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RODERICKREVES, SSSSOS™S™S~S

Petitioner, 18 CIVIL 8724 (LIL) -against- JUDGMENT SUPERINTENDENT LAMANNA, Respondent. we KX

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum and Order dated October 23, 2024, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Wang's recommendations in full. As Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purposes of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Accordingly, the case is closed.

Dated: New York, New York October 23, 2024 DANIEL ORTIZ Acting Clerk of Court

BY: tr Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reyes v. Superintendent LaManna, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Reyes v. Superintendent LaManna (Reyes v. Superintendent LaManna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)