Reid v. Jackson's Baggage Express
This text of 107 N.Y.S. 633 (Reid v. Jackson's Baggage Express) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff sued defendant for the loss of two trunks, for which she claimed $2,000. Defendant allowed its time to answer to expire, and a judgment by default was entered against defendant on the claim. Defendant moved to open the default, which motion was granted, on payment of $10 costs and disbursements. From the order granting the motion plaintiff appeals.
The motion papers are defective, in that they fail to contain a copy of the proposed answer. Schumpp v. Int. St. Ry. Co., 81 App. Div. 576-577, 81 N. Y. Supp. 366; Meyer v. City of New York, 80 App. Div. 584, 80 N. Y. Supp. 774; Allen v. Fowler, 45 App. Div. 506, 61 N. Y. Supp. 325.
The order is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion is denied, with $10 costs, but without prejudice to a new motion in the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 N.Y.S. 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-jacksons-baggage-express-nyappterm-1907.