Reid v. Jackson's Baggage Express

107 N.Y.S. 633
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 12, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 107 N.Y.S. 633 (Reid v. Jackson's Baggage Express) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reid v. Jackson's Baggage Express, 107 N.Y.S. 633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff sued defendant for the loss of two trunks, for which she claimed $2,000. Defendant allowed its time to answer to expire, and a judgment by default was entered against defendant on the claim. Defendant moved to open the default, which motion was granted, on payment of $10 costs and disbursements. From the order granting the motion plaintiff appeals.

The motion papers are defective, in that they fail to contain a copy of the proposed answer. Schumpp v. Int. St. Ry. Co., 81 App. Div. 576-577, 81 N. Y. Supp. 366; Meyer v. City of New York, 80 App. Div. 584, 80 N. Y. Supp. 774; Allen v. Fowler, 45 App. Div. 506, 61 N. Y. Supp. 325.

The order is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion is denied, with $10 costs, but without prejudice to a new motion in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Addressograph Co. v. H. B. Goetchius & Co.
131 N.Y.S. 583 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Cognato v. Fitzhenry
126 N.Y.S. 627 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 N.Y.S. 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-jacksons-baggage-express-nyappterm-1907.