Addressograph Co. v. H. B. Goetchius & Co.
This text of 131 N.Y.S. 583 (Addressograph Co. v. H. B. Goetchius & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to open a default, and to vacate a judgment of the Municipal Court, rendered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant. The moving papers do not contain either an affidavit of merits or a proposed answer, and presumably for this reason the motion was denied. Schumpp v. Interurban Ry. Co., 81 App. Div. 576, 81 N. Y. Supp. 366; Reid v. Jackson’s Exp. Co., 107 N. Y. Supp. 633; Bloch v. Weinstein, 113 N. Y. Supp. 1067.
Order affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to renew in the court below upon proper papers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 N.Y.S. 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/addressograph-co-v-h-b-goetchius-co-nyappterm-1911.