Addressograph Co. v. H. B. Goetchius & Co.

131 N.Y.S. 583
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 10, 1911·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to open a default, and to vacate a judgment of the Municipal Court, rendered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant. The moving papers do not contain either an affidavit of merits or a proposed answer, and presumably for this reason the motion was denied. Schumpp v. Interurban Ry. Co., 81 App. Div. 576, 81 N. Y. Supp. 366; Reid v. Jackson’s Exp. Co., 107 N. Y. Supp. 633; Bloch v. Weinstein, 113 N. Y. Supp. 1067.

Order affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to renew in the court below upon proper papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Addressograph Co. v. H. B. Goetchius & Co., 131 N.Y.S. 583 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

131 N.Y.S. 583 (Addressograph Co. v. H. B. Goetchius & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schumpp v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
81 A.D. 576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Reid v. Jackson's Baggage Express
107 N.Y.S. 633 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Bloch v. Weinstein
113 N.Y.S. 1067 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)