Cognato v. Fitzhenry

126 N.Y.S. 627
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 5, 1911·Published

Opinion

GIEGERICH, J.

The defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to open his default. The order appealed from granted [628] him leave to renew upon proper papers. The defendant • defaulted ■before joinder of issue, and upon the motion did not file either ,an affidavit of merits or a copy of his proposed answer, and evidently liis motion was denied for that reason, and properly. A copy of the proposed answer must be annexed to and served with the motion papers. Schumpp v. Int. St. Ry. Co., 81 App. Div. 576, 81 N. Y. Supp. 366; Meyer v. City of New York, 80 App. Div. 584, 80 N. Y. Supp, 774; Kuh v. Goldman, 119 App. Div. 148, 104 N. Y. Supp. 255; Reid v. Jackson’s Express, 107 N. Y. Supp. 633; Bloch v. Weinstein, 113 N. Y. Supp. 1067.

Order affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cognato v. Fitzhenry, 126 N.Y.S. 627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

126 N.Y.S. 627 (Cognato v. Fitzhenry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meyer v. City of New York
80 A.D. 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Schumpp v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
81 A.D. 576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Kuh v. Goldman
119 A.D. 148 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Reid v. Jackson's Baggage Express
107 N.Y.S. 633 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Bloch v. Weinstein
113 N.Y.S. 1067 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)