Cognato v. Fitzhenry
This text of 126 N.Y.S. 627 (Cognato v. Fitzhenry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to open his default. The order appealed from granted [628]*628him leave to renew upon proper papers. The defendant • defaulted ■before joinder of issue, and upon the motion did not file either ,an affidavit of merits or a copy of his proposed answer, and evidently liis motion was denied for that reason, and properly. A copy of the proposed answer must be annexed to and served with the motion papers. Schumpp v. Int. St. Ry. Co., 81 App. Div. 576, 81 N. Y. Supp. 366; Meyer v. City of New York, 80 App. Div. 584, 80 N. Y. Supp, 774; Kuh v. Goldman, 119 App. Div. 148, 104 N. Y. Supp. 255; Reid v. Jackson’s Express, 107 N. Y. Supp. 633; Bloch v. Weinstein, 113 N. Y. Supp. 1067.
Order affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 N.Y.S. 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cognato-v-fitzhenry-nyappterm-1911.