Reese v. Verizon California, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Reese v. Verizon California, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMay 8, 2012

Docket2012-1048

StatusUnpublished

This text of Reese v. Verizon California, Inc. (Reese v. Verizon California, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reese v. Verizon California, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

MORRIS REESE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

V.

VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant-Appellee,

AND

AT&T CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellee. °

2012-1048

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central I)istrict of California in case no. 11-CV-1934, Judge S. James Otero.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Morris Reese moves for a GO-day extension of time, until June 29, 2012, to his reply brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

REESE V. VERIZON CALIFORNIA

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted

NAY 08 2012 Date

cc: Rache1 C. Hughey, Esq. Michael J. Songer, Esq.

James Wallace, Jr., Esq.

FoR THE COURT

/S/ J an Horbaly J an Horbaly

Clerk

F|LED u.s.cuunr osm=a=emsroa ms panama c\ncun

NAY 08 2012

` JAN HDRBALV CLEHK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI