Reese v. Verizon California, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
MORRIS REESE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
V.
VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant-Appellee,
AND
AT&T CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellee. °
2012-1048
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central I)istrict of California in case no. 11-CV-1934, Judge S. James Otero.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Morris Reese moves for a GO-day extension of time, until June 29, 2012, to his reply brief.
Upon consideration thereof,
REESE V. VERIZON CALIFORNIA
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted
NAY 08 2012 Date
cc: Rache1 C. Hughey, Esq. Michael J. Songer, Esq.
James Wallace, Jr., Esq.
FoR THE COURT
/S/ J an Horbaly J an Horbaly
Clerk
F|LED u.s.cuunr osm=a=emsroa ms panama c\ncun
NAY 08 2012
` JAN HDRBALV CLEHK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reese v. Verizon California, Inc. (Reese v. Verizon California, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.