Reeder v. State

857 So. 2d 971, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16037, 2003 WL 22415371
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reeder v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6934
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 24, 2003·No. No. 1D03-0580·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant’s revocation of community control and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the written order of revocation of community control does not specify the conditions of community control that were violated, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order. Lee v. State, 826 So.2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, C.J., ERVIN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reeder v. State, 857 So. 2d 971, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16037, 2003 WL 22415371 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

857 So. 2d 971 (Reeder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Lee v. State
826 So. 2d 457 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)