Reeder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Reeder v. State

816 So. 2d 267, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6934, 2002 WL 1022129

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 22, 2002

DocketNo. 1D01-3118

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 816 So. 2d 267 (Reeder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reeder v. State, 816 So. 2d 267, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6934, 2002 WL 1022129 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Reeder seeks belated appeal from an amended sentence which was entered after he demonstrated to the trial court that he was entitled to relief under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). Petitioner has shown that he was not advised of his right to appeal at the time of resentencing, and we therefore grant the [268]*268petition. Robinson v. Wainwright, 245 So.2d 867 (Fla.1971). Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion will be provided to the clerk of trial court to be treated as a notice of appeal. Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D). The trial court is directed to consider whether Mr. Reeder may be entitled to appointment of counsel for the appeal. King v. State, 795 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

PETITION GRANTED,

BOOTH, WEBSTER and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

William Reeder seeks belated appeal from an amended sentence which was entered after he demonstrated to the trial court that he was entitled to relief under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). Petitioner has shown that he was not advised of his right to appeal at the time of resentencing, and we therefore grant the [268]*268petition. Robinson v. Wainwright, 245 So.2d 867 (Fla.1971). Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion will be provided to the clerk of trial court to be treated as a notice of appeal. Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D). The trial court is directed to consider whether Mr. Reeder may be entitled to appointment of counsel for the appeal. King v. State, 795 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

PETITION GRANTED,

BOOTH, WEBSTER and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

816 So. 2d 267, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6934, 2002 WL 1022129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeder-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack