Reeder v. State

840 So. 2d 437, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3773, 2003 WL 1387102
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reeder v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6934
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 21, 2003·No. No. 1D02-2445·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals a sentence of seventy-five months in the Department of Corrections imposed after he was re-sentenced pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). Appellant claims the trial judge erred in re-sentencing him without the assistance of appointed counsel. We agree. When a defendant is re-sentenced pursuant to Heggs v. State, a de novo hearing is required. The defendant is entitled to be present at the hearing and to receive the assistance of counsel. Jenkins v. State, 816 So.2d 780 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (ruling that in re-sentencing proceedings, such as the one here, the defendant is entitled to a de novo hearing and the assistance of counsel).

Accordingly, we vacate Appellant’s sentence and remand for re-sentencing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

[438]*438VAN NORTWICK AND POLSTON, JJ„ and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reeder v. State, 840 So. 2d 437, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3773, 2003 WL 1387102 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

840 So. 2d 437 (Reeder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Jenkins v. State
816 So. 2d 780 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)