Reed v. State
352 S.W.3d 368, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1177, 2011 WL 4037026
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reed v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1499 →
Opinion
ORDER
Larry Reed (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reed v. State, 352 S.W.3d 368, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1177, 2011 WL 4037026 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
352 S.W.3d 368 (Reed v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
KINNIKIN v. Second Injury Fund
352 S.W.3d 368 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)