Reed v. State
295 S.W.3d 876, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1524, 2009 WL 3444874
Opinion
ORDER
Homer Reed appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reed v. State, 295 S.W.3d 876, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1524, 2009 WL 3444874 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
295 S.W.3d 876 (Reed v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lange v. State
295 S.W.3d 876 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)