KINNIKIN v. Second Injury Fund
This text of 352 S.W.3d 368 (KINNIKIN v. Second Injury Fund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
John Kinnikin (hereinafter, “Claimant”) brings this appeal following the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (hereinafter, “the Commission”) award, denying Claimant permanent total disability compensation from the Second Injury Fund. Claimant raises one point on appeal, alleging the Commission ignored uncontradict-ed, unimpeached medical and vocational evidence.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. We find the Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence and is not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 223 (Mo. banc 2003). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, we have provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
352 S.W.3d 368, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1180, 2011 WL 4038652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinnikin-v-second-injury-fund-moctapp-2011.