Reed v. State
891 So. 2d 1211, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 981, 2005 WL 236412
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 2005·No. No. 3D05-13·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a claim that a notice of intent to habitualize is not sufficiently specific must be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reed v. State, 891 So. 2d 1211, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 981, 2005 WL 236412 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
891 So. 2d 1211 (Reed v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ferraro v. Ferraro
891 So. 2d 1211 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)