Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Reed v. State

Reed v. State

829 So. 2d 965, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15706, 2002 WL 31422921
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reed v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 783 So. 2d 1192 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 2002·No. No. 4D02-2501·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse in part the trial court’s order denying Willie Bud Reed Jr.’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. Reed alleged a legally sufficient claim requesting permis[966]*966sion to file a belated motion for postconviction relief. On remand the trial court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant retained counsel to timely file a rule 3.850 motion and whether counsel failed to timely file such a motion. See Medrano v. State, 748 So.2d 986 (Fla.1999); Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So.2d 931 (Fla.1999); Krasnick v. State, 780 So.2d 1045 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

KLEIN, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reed v. State, 829 So. 2d 965, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15706, 2002 WL 31422921 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

829 So. 2d 965 (Reed v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Krasnick v. State
780 So. 2d 1045 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Steele v. Kehoe
747 So. 2d 931 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Medrano v. State
748 So. 2d 986 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)