Reed v. State
891 So. 2d 1211, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 981, 2005 WL 236412
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 2, 2005
DocketNo. 3D05-13
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 891 So. 2d 1211 (Reed v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reed v. State, 891 So. 2d 1211, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 981, 2005 WL 236412 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a claim that a notice of intent to habitualize is not sufficiently specific must be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ferraro v. Ferraro
891 So. 2d 1211 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
891 So. 2d 1211, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 981, 2005 WL 236412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.