Reed v. State

898 So. 2d 1204, 2005 WL 840394
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 13, 2005·No. 3D05-448·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

898 So.2d 1204 (2005)

Hoover REED, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D05-448.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 13, 2005.

Hoover Reed, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Ishir Mehta, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before CORTIÑAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

*1205 CORTIÑAS, Judge.

Hoover Reed appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. The defendant-appellant was sentenced to thirty years in state prison as a habitual offender.

In this post-conviction motion, the defendant asserts that his sentence is impermissible under Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). That decision is inapplicable to the defendant's case as we have previously held that the decision in Blakely is not retroactive. Burgal v. State, 888 So.2d 702 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); see McBride v. State, 884 So.2d 476, 478 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reed v. State, 898 So. 2d 1204, 2005 WL 840394 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

898 So. 2d 1204 (Reed v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morrison v. State
932 So. 2d 533 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Fernandez v. State
910 So. 2d 352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)