Reed v. Kinkela
702 N.E.2d 903, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1427, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3389
Opinion
In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, writ allowed. Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered. [1428] See Workman v. Warden (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 1479, 687 N.E.2d 474; Pegan v. Crawmer (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 607, 609, 653 N.E.2d 659, 661. Respondents are ordered to file a return of writ within thirty days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within twenty days after the return. Petitioner’s physical presence before this court is not required. Gaskins v. Shiplevy (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 380, 382, 667 N.E.2d 1194, 1196.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reed v. Kinkela, 702 N.E.2d 903, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1427, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3389 (Ohio 1998).
702 N.E.2d 903 (Reed v. Kinkela) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Bradford v. Bowen
2023 Ohio 1105 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2023)
Pruitt v. Cook
986 N.E.2d 28 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)
In re Broom
914 N.E.2d 409 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)
Carrion v. Beightler
884 N.E.2d 66 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
Dunn v. Smith
883 N.E.2d 456 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
Sidle v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.
722 N.E.2d 526 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)