Carrion v. Beightler

Ohio Supreme Court

Carrion v. Beightler

884 N.E.2d 66, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1457

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 9, 2008

Docket2008-0557

StatusPublished

This text of 884 N.E.2d 66 (Carrion v. Beightler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carrion v. Beightler, 884 N.E.2d 66, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1457 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Jose Antonio Carrion.

Sua sponte, the writ is allowed. Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered. See Reed v. Kinkela (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 1427, 702 N.E.2d 903; Hernandez v. Kelly, 107 Ohio St.3d 1430, 2005-Ohio-6400, 838 N.E.2d 670.

Respondent shall file a return of writ within 21 days of service of the petition and petitioner may file a response within ten days after the return is filed. Petitioner’s physical presence before the court will not be required.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Jose Antonio Carrion.

Sua sponte, the writ is allowed. Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered. See Reed v. Kinkela (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 1427, 702 N.E.2d 903; Hernandez v. Kelly, 107 Ohio St.3d 1430, 2005-Ohio-6400, 838 N.E.2d 670.

Respondent shall file a return of writ within 21 days of service of the petition and petitioner may file a response within ten days after the return is filed. Petitioner’s physical presence before the court will not be required.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

884 N.E.2d 66, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrion-v-beightler-ohio-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack