Sidle v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

722 N.E.2d 526, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1493, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 164
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 19, 2000
Docket99-2286
StatusPublished

This text of 722 N.E.2d 526 (Sidle v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sidle v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 722 N.E.2d 526, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1493, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 164 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, writ allowed and post-release sanctions stayed. Allowing writ means that a return is ordered. See Reed v. Kinkela (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 1427, 702 N.E.2d 903. Respondents are ordered to file a return of writ within twenty days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within ten days after the return. Petitioner’s physical presence before the court is not required. Id.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this cause be sua sponte held for the decision in 99-1419, Woods v. Telb, Lucas App. No. L-99-1083.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would dismiss the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reed v. Kinkela
702 N.E.2d 903 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
722 N.E.2d 526, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1493, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sidle-v-ohio-adult-parole-auth-ohio-2000.