Reed v. Buckel
Opinion
MYCHAL REED, Case No.: 24-cv-0179-MMA (AHG) CDCR #AE-9821 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE A. BUCKEL, S. STEADMAN, T. MARTINEZ, B. COLON, B. CATES, et al., [Doc. No. 2] Defendants. Mychal Reed (“Plaintiff”), an inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. In lieu of paying the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), Plaintiff filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 2. All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $405. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, all prisoners who proceed IFP must pay the entire fee in “increments” or “installments,” Bruce v. Samuels, 577 U.S. 82, 83– 84 (2016), and regardless of whether their action is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). Section 1915(a)(2) requires all persons seeking to proceed without full prepayment of fees to file an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets possessed and demonstrates an inability to pay. See Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015). In support of this affidavit, the PLRA also requires prisoners to submit a “certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for . . . the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). Although Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Proceed IFP, he has not submitted a certified trust account statement “for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Because Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to commence a civil action, nor filed a properly supported Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), his case cannot yet proceed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Andrews, 493 F.3d at 1051. For this reason, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) is DENIED, and the action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prepay the $405 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); (2) Plaintiff is GRANTED forty-five (45) days from the date this Order in which to re-open his case by either: (a) prepaying the entire $405 civil filing and administrative fee in one lump-sum; or (b) filing a renewed Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a prison certificate, signed by a trust accounting official attesting as to his trust account balances and deposits and/or a certified copy of his Inmate Statement / / / Report for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b); and (3) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with a Court- approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed Jn Forma Pauperis.” Dated: January 29, 2024 Miku Tu - (ciples HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO United States District Judge 1]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reed v. Buckel (Reed v. Buckel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.