Redwine v. Frizzell

194 S.E. 175, 185 Ga. 191, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 678

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 13, 1937·No. No. 11904·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

After a general demurrer to a petition lias been sustained and the cause dismissed by the superior court, and that judgment is affirmed by the Supreme Court, without direction • or condition, the petition is not thereafter amendable. Central R. Co. v. Paterson, 87 Ga. 646 (13 S. E. 525) ; City of Rome v. Sudduth, 121 Ga. 420 (49 S. E. 300); McRae v. Sears, 183 Ga. 133 (187 S. E. 664). It makes no difference that the amendment is offered before the remittitur from the Supreme Court is made the judgment of the lower court. Kehr v. Floyd, 135 Ga. 424 (69 S. E. 550).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Norman I. Miller, for plaintiffs. W. H. Armistead, J. V. Patricio, and W. O. Wilson, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grice, Justice.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Norman I. Miller, for plaintiffs. W. H. Armistead, J. V. Patricio, and W. O. Wilson, for defendants.

Redwine v. Frizzell, 194 S.E. 175, 185 Ga. 191, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 678 (Ga. 1937).

Pincite

194 S.E. 175 (Redwine v. Frizzell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Helmly v. Schultz

134 S.E.2d 810 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)

Duvall v. Cox

123 S.E.2d 546 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)

Jones v. West End Theatre Co.

97 S.E.2d 386 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)

Simpson v. Hayes

69 S.E.2d 567 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)

Durham v. Smith

3 S.E.2d 719 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)

Opinion

Related