Kehr v. Floyd & Co.
This text of 69 S.E. 550 (Kehr v. Floyd & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. After a general demurrer to a declaration has been sustained and the cause dismissed by the superior court, and that judgment affirmed in the Supreme Court without condition or direction, the declaration is not amendable. Central R. Co. v. Patterson, 87 Ga. 646 (13 S. E. 525) ; Benning v. Horkan, 123 Ga. 454 (51 S. E. 333) ; Goldsmith v. Georgia R. Co., 62 Ga. 543.
(a) Accordingly it was not erroneous in the present ease, after the decision of the Supreme Court and before the remittitur was made the judgment of the superior court, for the judge to refuse to allow the plaintiffs to reinstate the ease in the superior court for the purpose of affording an opportunity to amend the petition.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 S.E. 550, 135 Ga. 424, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kehr-v-floyd-co-ga-1910.