Jones v. West End Theatre Co.

97 S.E.2d 386, 95 Ga. App. 178, 1957 Ga. App. LEXIS 747
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. West End Theatre Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 Ga. App. 299
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 19, 1957·No. 36583·Published

Opinion

Townsend, J.

“After a general demurrer to a declaration has been sustained and the cause dismissed by the lower court, and that judgment affirmed by the appellate court without condition or direction, the declaration is not amendable. . . Central R. & Bkg. Co. v. Paterson, 87 Ga. 646 (13 S. E. 525); Harp. v. Southern Ry. Co., 119 Ga. 927 (4) (47 S. E. 206); City of Rome v. Sudduth, 121 Ga. 420 (1) (49 S. E. 300); Kehr v. Floyd & Co., 135 Ga. 424 (69 S. E. 550); Federal Investment Co. v. Ewing, 166 Ga. 246 (2) (142 S. E. 890); McRae v. Sears, 183 Ga. 133 (187 S. E. 664); Redwine v. Frizzell, 185 Ga. 191 (194 S. E. 175); Durham v. Smith, 188 Ga. 233 (3 S. E. 2d 719).” Simpson v. Hayes, 208 Ga. 754 (69 S. E. 2d 567). This case having been dismissed on general demurrer, and that judgment having been affirmed by the appellate court (Jones v. West End Theatre Co., 94 Ga. App. 299, 94 S. E. 2d 135), the trial court did not err in vacating as improvidently granted an order allowing an amendment to the petition after the affirmance of the dismissal of the case by this court.

Judgment affirmed.

Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. West End Theatre Co., 97 S.E.2d 386, 95 Ga. App. 178, 1957 Ga. App. LEXIS 747 (Ga. Ct. App. 1957).

97 S.E.2d 386 (Jones v. West End Theatre Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. West End Theatre Co.
94 S.E.2d 135 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Simpson v. Hayes
69 S.E.2d 567 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Paterson
13 S.E. 525 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1891)
Harp v. Southern Railway Co.
47 S.E. 206 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
City of Rome v. Sudduth
49 S.E. 300 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Kehr v. Floyd & Co.
69 S.E. 550 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Federal Investment Co. v. Ewing
142 S.E. 890 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
McRae v. Sears
187 S.E. 664 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Redwine v. Frizzell
194 S.E. 175 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Durham v. Smith
3 S.E.2d 719 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)