Record Wide Distributors, Inc. v. Commissioner

1981 T.C. Memo. 12, 41 T.C.M. 704, 1981 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 732
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedJanuary 12, 1981
DocketDocket No. 11595-78.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1981 T.C. Memo. 12 (Record Wide Distributors, Inc. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Record Wide Distributors, Inc. v. Commissioner, 1981 T.C. Memo. 12, 41 T.C.M. 704, 1981 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 732 (tax 1981).

Opinion

RECORD WIDE DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Record Wide Distributors, Inc. v. Commissioner
Docket No. 11595-78.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1981-12; 1981 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 732; 41 T.C.M. (CCH) 704; T.C.M. (RIA) 81012;
January 12, 1981; As Amended February 11, 1981
Claude Hanks and Leonard R. Yocum, for the petitioner.
David T. Karzon, Jr., for the respondent.

FORRESTER

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

FORRESTER, Judge: Respondent has determined deficiencies in petitioner's Federal income tax for its taxable years 1972, 1973, and 1974, in the amounts of $ 92,056.99, $ 34,444.54, and $ 21,232.29, respectively. The issues presented for our decision are (1) whether petitioner should have reported its income on*734 an accrual rather than the cash method of accounting, (2) whether respondent properly calculated petitioner's increase in accounts receivable for the years in issue and (3) whether petitioner is entitled to a bad debt deduction for its taxable year 1974.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.

Petitioner, Record Wide Distributors, Inc., is a Missouri Corporation with its principal place of business in Fenton, Missoui. It timely filed its U.S. Corporation Income Tax Returns, Form 1120, for the calendar years 1972, 1973, and 1974 with the Internal Revenue Service Center at Kansas City, Missouri.

Petitioner was incorporated on March 7, 1972, prior to which the business was operated as a sole proprietorship known as Bootheel Records by Gayron Lytle. During the years in issue Gayron Lytle owned 100% of the stock of petitioner and was its president. His brother, Randall, was vice president and petitioner's managing officer during those years.

Petitioner is a wholesaler in the business of selling phonograph records, 8-track tapes, and cassette tapes to wholesalers and retailers. The bulk of the merchandise sold by it are cut outs. Cut outs*735 are budget products which the manufacturer has not been able to sell in its market. The petitioner assembles cut outs into lots of varying size and then ships them to retailers for sale at highly discounted prices. The nature of cut outs, being less marketable, makes it virtually impossible for a retailer to determine to what extent a given lot of records or tapes will be sold. For this reason petitioner guaranteed its customers that they could return any unsold items for full credit. There are no written contracts between petitioner and its customers, but petitioner has been profitable notwithstanding.

Petitioner's policy has been not to require any payment for records and tapes until the retailer had sold all of the product that it could and returned the unsold merchandise. Although petitioner has a policy whereby it encourages returns and payments within 120 days of shipment, it often does not receive payments and returns for well over 120 days, sometimes even over a year. At the time petitioner shipped goods to a customer an invoice was sent along showing the amount, description, and price of the items sold. Petitioner has historically experienced returns of between 50*736 and 60 percent. Of the goods shipped by petitioner in any taxable year 30-35 percent of the returns with respect thereto were received by petitioner in a later taxable year (usually within the first 4 months).

One of petitioner's major customers was Sound On Tape Distributors, Inc., a wholesaler of 8-track tapes (hereinafter Sound On). Petitioner maintained the same return policy with Sound On that it did with its other customers. Until 1974 Sound On dealt heavily in what are known as bootleg, duplicate, or counterfeit tapes. In February 1974 Sound On was enjoined from selling such tapes. As a result, Sound On's inventory was nearly worthless and it returned the tapes to petitioner. After crediting Sound On for these returns Sound On owed petitioner $ 176,574.22. Although Sound On's financial position was unstable its management attempted to salvage the business. Petitioner no longer extended Sound On credit after 1974 but required payments (including return credit) at least equal to the amount of merchandise shipped prior to or at the time of shipment. Several of Sound On's checks bounced. Thus, starting in 1976, petitioner required cash only upon delivery.

In 1978 petitioner*737 and Sound On executed an agreement settling the latter's outstanding debt which had been reduced to the principal amount of $ 161,000 owed to petitioner, for $ 5,000. Sound On ceased doing business shortly after the execution of this agreement. On its books petitioner wrote off the uncollected Sound On debt in 1978, however, it has never been written off for Federal income tax purposes.

During the years in issue, and before, petitioner operated on a hybrid method of accounting. It maintained an inventory on its books for determining its cost of sales 1 but determined its sales on the cash basis. That is, petitioner posted sales only as it received cash. Furthermore, petitioner did not include goods received from the manufacturer but not paid for on its Schedule A as "Merchandise bought for Manufacturer or Sale."

Respondent has determined that petitioner's method of reporting income from sales, i.e., the cash receipts and disbursements method, does not clearly reflect income*738 and that an accrual method of accounting does clearly reflect income. Consequently, respondent increased petitioner's income for taxable years 1972, 1973, and 1974 by $ 191,775.41, $ 71,759.47, and $ 44,233.93, respectively. 2

OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Niles Bement Pond Co. v. United States
281 U.S. 357 (Supreme Court, 1930)
Spring City Foundry Co. v. Commissioner
292 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Commissioner v. Hansen
360 U.S. 446 (Supreme Court, 1959)
Thor Power Tool Co. v. Commissioner
439 U.S. 522 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Duesenberg, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
84 F.2d 921 (Seventh Circuit, 1936)
Perry v. Commissioner
22 T.C. No. 117 (U.S. Tax Court, 1954)
Ezo Products Co. v. Commissioner
37 T.C. 385 (U.S. Tax Court, 1961)
Harbin v. Commissioner
40 T.C. 373 (U.S. Tax Court, 1963)
Riss v. Commissioner
56 T.C. 388 (U.S. Tax Court, 1971)
Mueller v. Commissioner
60 T.C. No. 5 (U.S. Tax Court, 1973)
Brooks-Massey Dodge, Inc. v. Commissioner
60 T.C. No. 94 (U.S. Tax Court, 1973)
Gordon v. Commissioner
63 T.C. 51 (U.S. Tax Court, 1974)
Sika Chemical Corp. v. Commissioner
64 T.C. 856 (U.S. Tax Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1981 T.C. Memo. 12, 41 T.C.M. 704, 1981 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/record-wide-distributors-inc-v-commissioner-tax-1981.