Rebecca Melder v. Carolyn W. Colvin

546 F. App'x 605
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 6, 2013
Docket13-1729
StatusUnpublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 546 F. App'x 605 (Rebecca Melder v. Carolyn W. Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rebecca Melder v. Carolyn W. Colvin, 546 F. App'x 605 (8th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rebecca Lynn Melder appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits (DIB). Upon *606 de novo review of the record, see McDade v. Astrue, 720 F.3d 994, 997-98 (8th Cir.2013), we find no basis for overturning the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) determination that Melder was not disabled before her insured status expired, see Tilley v. Astrue, 580 F.3d 675, 676 (8th Cir.2009) (holding DIB claimant must prove disability before expiration of insured status). To the extent Melder has properly developed the issues she raises, see Garden v. Cent. Nebraska Hous. Corp., 719 F.3d 899, 905 n. 2 (8th Cir.2013) (holding undeveloped argument is deemed waived), we find the Appeals Council did not err by declining to consider the additional evidence Melder offered in seeking review of the ALJ’s adverse decision, see Bergmann v. Apfel, 207 F.3d 1065, 1069-70 (8th Cir.2000) (explaining when evidence offered to Appeals Council must be considered); the record did not establish severe impairments other than fibromyalgia, see Kirby v. Astrue, 500 F.3d 705, 707-08 (8th Cir.2007) (holding it is claimant’s burden to establish that impairment is severe; if impairment has no more than minimal effect on claimant’s ability to work, it does not qualify as severe); and the ALJ properly discounted the opinion of treating physician Fred Na-gel on Melder’s residual functional capacity, see Renstrom v. Astrue, 680 F.3d 1057, 1064 (8th Cir.2012) (concluding treating physician’s opinion does not automatically control). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Songer, Jr. v. O'Malley
E.D. Missouri, 2025
Vang v. Saul
D. Minnesota, 2019
Bruce v. Saul
D. Minnesota, 2019
Pfeifer v. Saul
D. Minnesota, 2019
Moua v. Berryhill
D. Minnesota, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
546 F. App'x 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rebecca-melder-v-carolyn-w-colvin-ca8-2013.