Raynor v. Raynor
279 A.D. 670, 108 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3419
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1951·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Defendant’s remarriage, with its attendant additional obligations, is not such a change in circumstances as to justify a reduction of the amount of alimony. (Goldberg v. Goldberg, 265 App. Div. 946; Withowski v. Withowski, 271 App. Div. 901, affd. 297 N. Y. 626.) Appeal from order dated September 18, 1950, dismissed, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raynor v. Raynor, 279 A.D. 670, 108 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3419 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
279 A.D. 670 (Raynor v. Raynor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Monfette v. Van Sickle
76 Misc. 2d 275 (NYC Family Court, 1973)
Zoro ex rel. Lino v. Lino
71 Misc. 2d 725 (NYC Family Court, 1972)
Dominick v. Dominick
26 Misc. 2d 344 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Balmer v. Balmer
12 Misc. 2d 226 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)