Raynor v. Raynor
279 A.D. 671, 108 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3420
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1951·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
The court had jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter, on the motion for a reduction of alimony (Fox v. Fox, 263 N. Y. 68; Civ. Prac. Act, § 1170), and the lack of an authenticating certificate was a defect or irregularity which could be corrected nunc pro tunc. (Cf. Kelly v. Schramm, 197 App. Div. 377; Lawton v. Kiel, 51 Barb. 30; Civ. Prac. Act, § 105.) Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raynor v. Raynor, 279 A.D. 671, 108 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3420 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
279 A.D. 671 (Raynor v. Raynor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Ass'n v. Diaz
56 Misc. 3d 1136 (New York Supreme Court, 2017)
Midfirst Bank v. Agho
121 A.D.3d 343 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Moccia v. Carrier Car Rental, Inc.
40 A.D.3d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Martin
11 Misc. 3d 219 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2005)
Sparaco v. Sparaco
309 A.D.2d 1029 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Nandy v. Albany Medical Center Hospital
155 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
King v. Brown
72 Misc. 2d 560 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
Gordon v. Gordon
17 Misc. 2d 734 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)