Raynor v. Raynor

279 A.D. 671, 108 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3420
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 19, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 279 A.D. 671 (Raynor v. Raynor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raynor v. Raynor, 279 A.D. 671, 108 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3420 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

The court had jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter, on the motion for a reduction of alimony (Fox v. Fox, 263 N. Y. 68; Civ. Prac. Act, § 1170), and the lack of an authenticating certificate was a defect or irregularity which could be corrected nunc pro tunc. (Cf. Kelly v. Schramm, 197 App. Div. 377; Lawton v. Kiel, 51 Barb. 30; Civ. Prac. Act, § 105.) Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Ass'n v. Diaz
56 Misc. 3d 1136 (New York Supreme Court, 2017)
Midfirst Bank v. Agho
121 A.D.3d 343 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Moccia v. Carrier Car Rental, Inc.
40 A.D.3d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Martin
11 Misc. 3d 219 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2005)
Sparaco v. Sparaco
309 A.D.2d 1029 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Nandy v. Albany Medical Center Hospital
155 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
King v. Brown
72 Misc. 2d 560 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
Gordon v. Gordon
17 Misc. 2d 734 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 671, 108 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raynor-v-raynor-nyappdiv-1951.