Goldberg v. Goldberg

265 A.D. 946, 38 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6674
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 14, 1942·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The learned justice at Special Term exercised improperly the discretion vested in him in reducing the alimony. The defendant is shown to earn approximately twenty-five dollars per week. Under all the circumstances disclosed in the record, eight dollars thereof is a fair portion to be paid to the plaintiff. It is immaterial that as an incident to his second marriage, in violation of the decree herein, expense has been incurred by the defendant for the support and hospitalization of his present wife. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldberg v. Goldberg, 265 A.D. 946, 38 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

265 A.D. 946 (Goldberg v. Goldberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Monfette v. Van Sickle
76 Misc. 2d 275 (NYC Family Court, 1973)
Zoro ex rel. Lino v. Lino
71 Misc. 2d 725 (NYC Family Court, 1972)
Dominick v. Dominick
26 Misc. 2d 344 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Balmer v. Balmer
12 Misc. 2d 226 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Raynor v. Raynor
279 A.D. 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)