Rayford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rayford v. State

322 S.W.3d 162, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1296, 2010 WL 3760266

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 28, 2010

DocketED 94223

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 322 S.W.3d 162 (Rayford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rayford v. State, 322 S.W.3d 162, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1296, 2010 WL 3760266 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Rayford (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the *163 City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion. On appeal, Movant raises two points claiming that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion without an evidentiary hearing. We find no error and affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The findings and conclusions of the motion court ar& based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. Sup.Ct. R. (2009), unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI