State v. Rayford

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Rayford

278 S.W.3d 736, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 227, 2009 WL 595921

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 10, 2009

DocketED 91179

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 S.W.3d 736 (State v. Rayford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rayford, 278 S.W.3d 736, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 227, 2009 WL 595921 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

*737 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, David Rayford, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of stealing third offense, in violation of sections 570.0B0 and 570.040 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a persistent offender and sentenced him to seven years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI