Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ray v. State

Ray v. State

776 So. 2d 369, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 977, 2001 WL 85528
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 2001·No. No. 5D00-3755·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

• AFFIRMED. Based on defendant’s numerous and successive meritless pro se filings, we hold that Mr. Ray is precluded from filing any additional pro se appeals, pleadings, motions or petitions relating to his conviction and sentence in trial court cases CR-90-2313 and CR-90-4412, unless reviewed and signed by an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida. See Rahymes v. State, 730 So.2d 420, 422 (Fla. 5th DCA), cause dismissed, 733 So.2d 516 (Fla.1999); Davis v. State, 705 So.2d 133, 135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409, 410-411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); see also Lockett v. State, 769 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

GRIFFIN, PALMER and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. State, 776 So. 2d 369, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 977, 2001 WL 85528 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

776 So. 2d 369 (Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Janson v. State
785 So. 2d 731 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)