Ray v. State

814 So. 2d 520, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5236, 2002 WL 662935
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 849 So. 2d 1222
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 24, 2002·No. No. 3D01-3380·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert B. Ray, defendant, appeals the denial of his Motion to Correct ■ Illegal Sentence. The state concedes that defendant’s motion is well taken and that he is entitled to relief on Counts III, IV and IX where he was sentenced to 120 years in state prison on each count to run consecutive to each other and to all other counts. The convictions in these three counts were for the crime of robbery without a firearm, a second degree felony, which carries a maximum statutory penalty of fifteen-years incarceration.

Accordingly, we reverse the order denying defendant’s Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence and remand to the trial court with directions to grant the motion and re-sentence defendant on Counts III, IV and IX to fifteen-years in state prison. These sentences will run consecutive to each other and to all other counts. The defendant does not need to be present for re-sentencing.1

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. State, 814 So. 2d 520, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5236, 2002 WL 662935 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

814 So. 2d 520 (Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.