Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Janson v. State

Janson v. State

775 So. 2d 434, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 355, 2001 WL 43068
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 19, 2001
DocketNo. 5D00-2766
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 775 So. 2d 434 (Janson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Janson v. State, 775 So. 2d 434, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 355, 2001 WL 43068 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

HARRIS, J.

The issue here is whether the trial court erred in refusing to grant an extension of time to file a motion for rehearing after the ruling on Janson’s Rule 3.850 motion because “motions for rehearing are not permitted” on motions for postconviction relief. We reverse. See Rule 3.850(g), Fla. R.Crim. P. (granting a fifteen-day period for the filing of a motion for rehearing “of any order denying a motion under this rule”); See also Sanders v. State, 611 So.2d 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMPSON, C.J., and SAWAYA, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nguyen v. State
868 So. 2d 666 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
775 So. 2d 434, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 355, 2001 WL 43068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janson-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.