Ray v. State
118 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 687
Opinion
The only' question presented is the refusal of the court to give to the jury the general charge as requested by defendant. It could serve no good purpose to discuss the evidence in detail, but we conclude that the facts proven and the legitimate inferences to be drawn are sufficient to justify the verdict of a jury who heard the facts and saw the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ray v. State, 118 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 687 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).
118 So. 926 (Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ray v. State
118 So. 921 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)