Ray v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Ray v. State

128 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 669

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 Ala. App. 262 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 1930·No. 6 Div. 764.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Upon arraignment, this appellant interposed a plea of guilty as charged in the indictment, but, notwithstanding said plea, he took this appeal from the judgment of conviction pronounced and entered in this case. His pun-' *670 ishment was fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for an indeterminate term.

This appeal was apparently taken for delay, as.it is predicated here upon the record proper without a bill of exceptions. The record being in all things regular, the judgment ■of conviction in the lower court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

Upon arraignment, this appellant interposed a plea of guilty as charged in the indictment, but, notwithstanding said plea, he took this appeal from the judgment of conviction pronounced and entered in this case. His pun-' *670 ishment was fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for an indeterminate term.

This appeal was apparently taken for delay, as.it is predicated here upon the record proper without a bill of exceptions. The record being in all things regular, the judgment ■of conviction in the lower court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Ray v. State, 128 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 669 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

128 So. 923 (Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.