Ray v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Ray v. State

128 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 669

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 20, 1930

Docket6 Div. 764.

StatusPublished

This text of 128 So. 923 (Ray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ray v. State, 128 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 669 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Upon arraignment, this appellant interposed a plea of guilty as charged in the indictment, but, notwithstanding said plea, he took this appeal from the judgment of conviction pronounced and entered in this case. His pun-' *670 ishment was fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for an indeterminate term.

This appeal was apparently taken for delay, as.it is predicated here upon the record proper without a bill of exceptions. The record being in all things regular, the judgment ■of conviction in the lower court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

Upon arraignment, this appellant interposed a plea of guilty as charged in the indictment, but, notwithstanding said plea, he took this appeal from the judgment of conviction pronounced and entered in this case. His pun-' *670 ishment was fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for an indeterminate term.

This appeal was apparently taken for delay, as.it is predicated here upon the record proper without a bill of exceptions. The record being in all things regular, the judgment ■of conviction in the lower court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-state-alactapp-1930.